Category: Libertarianism

Poland Seizes Private Pensions

From Reuters:

Poland said on Wednesday it will transfer to the state many of the assets held by private pension funds, slashing public debt but putting in doubt the future of the multi-billion-euro funds, many of them foreign-owned.

The changes went deeper than many in the market expected and could fuel investor concerns that the government is ditching some business-friendly policies to try to improve its flagging popularity with voters.

The Polish pension funds’ organisation said the changes may be unconstitutional because the government is taking private assets away from them without offering any compensation.

(Emphasis mine)

This was done to shore up their sovereign debt. If Poland is successful, I wonder how long before other nations decide to nationalize those assets.

With the looming pension and Medicare crises at home, how secure do you think your retirement investments are?

Even the EPA Has A SWAT Unit

And feel the need to use it. Not to invade the evil polluting corporations armed with automatic weapons (seen on TV), but to do routine Clean Water checks. From Reason:

Chicken is a small roost, boasting all of 17 full-time residents and lots of seasonal mine workers, according to the Dispatch. The EPA wouldn’t explain why it has suddenly shifted to an armed team to check for Clean Water Act violations. According to the Dispatch, one Senate staffer was told the EPA sent an armed team because they were told by Alaska State Troopers there was “rampant drug and human trafficking” in the area. A spokesperson for the troopers denies they told the EPA any such thing.

Because, y’know, the EPA needs its own heavily armed agents to take water samples in the dangerous part of Alaska. And we’ll use the magic term drugs to explain.

Homestead Detroit!

I was listening to the Red Eye podcast and one of the guests made an off-the-cuff remark about sending all the illegal immigrants to Detroit. I chuckled, and then thought, that’s not a bad idea.

Project: Homestead Detroit. Reclaim urban blight. Citizenship after two years of productive work.

I mean, it can’t be worse than most of the eminent domain grabs?

Friday Quote – Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Fifty years ago, America first heard Dr. Martin Luther King’s dream.

Yes, Dr. King, I will judge people, not by the color of their skin (or what was their first language, or whom they choose as their life partners), but by the content of their character. I will do my best to live up to your dream and to pass it on to those around me, especially my niece and nephew. I will remember the your sacrifices and those of your brothers and sisters to remind us that all humans are born with natural rights and it is immoral to take them away simply because of morphological or cultural reasons.

I will remember to try and make the dream as much of a reality as I can.

Not Sure if Troll, Parody, or Loon

So some lady put up a manifesto on Slate demanding that all parents in America put their children into public schools. Because that will make them better. In a few generations. Maybe.

Of course, all is offered is anecdote. No real data on how this magic transformation is to occur other than people with”skin in the game” will demand change.

That’s worked so well for the past fifty years.

Update: It seems Larry Corriea decided that this article was worth one of his infamous fiskings.

Anti-Smoking Crusaders Can’t Accept a Victory

Nick Gillespie, over at Reason, wrote an article on the anti-smoking crusaders new campaign against e-cigarettes.

Witzman
H.L. Mencken famously defined puritanism as “the haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.” He might have been describing contemporary anti-smoking activists, that dour band of fuss-budgets constantly on the prowl for new ways to make life slightly less bearable by limiting the choices available to grown adults.

Incredibly, the latest push from tobacco eliminationists doesn’t involve actual smoking, which has already been driven out of polite society more thoroughly than Rev. Jeremiah Wright sermons, early David Allan Coe records, and Three’s Company-era gay jokes combined. But it does lay bare the prohibitionist mindset and its fixation on scrubbing the planet clean of any behavior or attitude the crusader deems unacceptable.

This time, the buttinskys are trying to douse the dreaded e-cigarette, a device that supplies a safe nicotine hit to the user without bothering or endangering anybody else. E-cigarettes use replaceable cartridges in which nicotine or flavors are heated, vaporized, and inhaled (users are called “vapers”). Some e-cigarettes look like conventional cancer sticks and others look more like something from a bad Sylvester Stallone movie set in the near future. Questions of fashion aside, they are not just a safer way for smokers to get the nicotine they crave, they are apparently as safe as milk (well, pasteurized milk, anyway, and assuming you’re not lactose intolerant).

I’ve had several friends who made the switch from tobacco to electronic. One in particular saw his “smoker’s cough” vanish completely. Granted, this is purely anecdotal, but the scientific evidence is there.

Why We Have The First Amendment

So the government can’t threaten to shut down a paper because it’s leaking details of government abuses.

The British government, which has much more authority over the press, demands the return of the Snowden materials. Then it goes to The Guardian’s offices to make sure the hard drives containing the information are destroyed.

This new aggressive surveillance state is bad enough, but you’d think that the people who have gone to great lengths to monitor email would have an understanding of the Interwebz and that you can’t stop the signal.

Stop Advocating and Tell Us the Science

In my opinion, the biggest reason that the populace (particularly the American populace) doesn’t believe in climate change is the demands on policy made by many climatologists. It doesn’t help that many of those who are sounding the death drums can only think of government intervention as the only means to alleviate the changes.

So, it’s nice to see when a climatologist reminds her profession to just tell the science and stay out of policy.

I believe advocacy by climate scientists has damaged trust in the science. We risk our credibility, our reputation for objectivity, if we are not absolutely neutral. At the very least, it leaves us open to criticism. I find much climate scepticism is driven by a belief that environmental activism has influenced how scientists gather and interpret evidence. So I’ve found my hardline approach successful in taking the politics and therefore – pun intended – the heat out of climate science discussions.

Science should strive to tell us what is going on in the natural world and help to develop new technologies. Climatologists telling me that only a carbon tax will save the world from destruction looks like a fool because (s)he obviously doesn’t understand how market economies work or that the best way to a clean environment is through prosperity.

H/t Uncle

I Am Spartacus (TJIC, Rodeo Clown…)

Sarah Hoyt has an excellent post up over at her place. YOU NEED TO RTWT.

I am Spartacus because Benghazi.

I am Spartacus because summer of recovery 1, and 2, and 3, and 4, and 5… and?

I am Spartacus because at some point you have made enough money – AND THAT’S FOR YOU TO DECIDE, not bureaucrats. And if you never think you’ve made enough money, that’s your decision.

I am Spartacus because Fast and Furious.

I am Spartacus because I want the government to leave me alone.

I am Spartacus because I DID build that.

And that’s just a small part.